Epson C11C698201 Best Prices, Sales, Reviews, Compare
![]() |
Epson C11C698201 Best Prices, Sales, Reviews, Compare.
Product: Epson C11C698201 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Epson C11C698201
I'll begin with a short review since I honest got the printer and have only accelerate 5 prints through it. I will update in a week or so with more information.
Setup and installation was easy. I have it on my network for my Windows machines and it is connected directly to my Mac Pro. The install documentation said to procure the latest driver for Leopard off of their status, which I did and installed with no plight. The latest Windows driver was on the installation CD.
The reason I called this review "Station of the Art" is Epson developed Radiance, the modern color-matching technology built into the R1900. This is the first printer with it, even the unusual Epson Pro printers don't have it. Printerville.come by has an article about it.
The few pictures I have printed are radiant and they printed very swiftly.
I printed 3 on Epson's Ultra Premium luster 8.5 x 11 paper using Photoshop CS2. I tried different settings for each print of the same standard color matching target. All three printed very nice and as expected, a microscopic different. Using "Photoshop Determines Colors", "Printer Determines Colors" and "No Color Management", with appropriate settings on the printer driver. So it will be up to you to resolve which settings you want to employ.
Next, as a test I printed a photo, of my daughter, on lifeless HP Quick-witted White paper. WOW, is all I can say. Dreary paper and it looked astronomical.
For my last test I picked a random paper size, 12" x 12", that I cleave from a 13" x 19" sheet of matte paper. I changed the paper size in the driver and printed. No spot, it printed fair pretty and also was fair.
I understanding on getting a roll of paper too. I've wanted to print some banners, something I couldn't do with my original Canon I9900.
So far it is everything I expected it to be. However, I do notion on keeping the I9900 because sometimes I know I will want a dye (not pigment) print (and I level-headed have Canon ink and paper left) .
I will post more soon.
Update 3-10-08:
I have been playing with the settings on the driver to study which I like best. It is a good/bad thing that there are so many settings to play with. I figure I will eventually figure out which I like best. There are subtle differences in color, skin tones and gray scales on the gray scales. If you are alive to in the test targets, you can download the printer test images I old from http://www.drycreekphoto.com/tools/index.html
I will launch printing some of my valid pictures to compare with the I9900 versions. So I will post another update in a week or two.
I tried a roll in the printer. It was surprising easy to position up and spend. You effect the holders on the roll, mount it on the assist of the printer, then feed the paper into the printer in the slot on the support. The printer recognizes you are doing it, then grabs the paper to feed in to the honorable starring point.
If you print multiple images, the printer spaces them 1" apart. Unfortunately, Epson peaceful has it's artificial limit length of 44". There are expensive RIPs (raster image processors) that will allow you to printer longer images, but unless you are going to do this a lot, it can't be worth it. The cheapest I found is $500.
I've decided that I probably will not exercise the "roll" on the printer. I want to printer banners every so often, but to employ the roll for one print wastes about 10" of paper. That is the initial feed of about 4" and when you reduce it on the befriend to free it, another 6". If you are printing many prints on a roll, then it will be worth it and easier. I suggest (and what I did in my second test), was objective nick a 44" of paper (from the roll) and feed it though the (normal) auto paper feeder and that worked fair for the banner without any slay.
As for ink usage, I've hardly made a dent with the 10 8x10s, 1 12x12, 3 8.5 x 44 prints I've made. The banners were not printed at high resolution to keep ink for my testing. I admire Amazon, but it's ink prices for this printer are currently scheme out of line. Even the Epson store has them for arrangement less. I hope that changes soon.
Update 3-26-08 (my last update) .
After printing 25 more 8x10 high resolution (and in monotonous mode for better quality), I finally ran out of ink in one cartridge (and it was the gloss optimizer) . After more reading, I reflect I old the rank setting for the gloss and was wasting it on white state outside of the image. I'm level-headed learning.
Some of the other inks are elegant improper, so I have stocked up.
I collected have not printed on a DVD/CD yet, but I'm clear that will be glorious.
There is not noteworthy more for me to say except I am very gay with this capture and ask to exercise this printer for the next 3-4 years, when I'm definite something else out there will net my attention.
Howard
I'd reflect seriously before buying this printer. I purchased this printer about 6 weeks ago after NAPP members were offered a discount. I purchased it directly from the Epson Store. I watched the video tutorials on how to net the best results using the R1900 and printing out of Lightroom that were provided on www.photoshopuser.com. I was Cheerful at the output and the quality. Never had my printer output so closely matched that of my calibrated monitor, and the 13x19 plug glossies were magnificent. I was THRILLED...
UNTIL...about 5 weeks after purchasing the printer I had to replace the Gloss Optimizer cartridge. This runs out fairly quick as it is applied to the entire photo regardless of colors. Delicate, I had extra salubrious Epson cartridges I had purchased from a national retailer. Even though it was the true cartridge the printer would not stare it, then remembering that Epson had sent an extra Gloss cartridge, I dug it out thinking I had indeed bought the base one. I replaced it with the one Epson sent and all was kindly. I confirmed I had the Factual cartridge, and chalked it up to a unsuitable cartridge. No biggy, it happens...THEN the Cyan ran out. I replaced it with a cartridge that I bought directly from the Epson store and had the same articulate. The printer says it's an incompatible cartridge. IT is NOT. I called Epson abet on Friday and they said they would send me a unique cartridge and that it would be 3-5 days. Blooming, but in the meantime I had prints that needed to be printed, so I again went to a retailer and bought a cyan cartridge. Not recognized. I googled the narrate and found that other users had had the same whisper, and that Epson had replaced their printers with effect unique ones. I called Epson again. They said that they would only replace with a refurb since I was past the 30 day trace since I purchased, AND according to the Epson Warranty, I'LL be on the hook for shipping the sinful printer to them. Jam is, I'm determined this printer was wicked from day one, but since I didn't print a WHOLE lot apt away, the cartridges didn't need replacing until after the 30 day return was up,and consequently I didn't regain the defect until then. I'm extremely upset. I now have a bunch of irascible cartridges and/or printer, no diagram to print the work I need to fetch out, and the best I can hope for is to obtain a REFURBISHED printer to replace the Ticket Unique printer I paid for. Do yourself a favor, gawk at the Canon and HP equivalent printers. If you search for issues on Epson cartridges, you'll come by TONS. Not necessarily with the R1900, but with almost all Epson printers. This is the first, and LAST Epson I will prefer.
I have had this printer for a week now and all I can say is WOW! I was concerned after I read the reviews here but decided to seize anyway because of past experience with Epson, and I am so joyful I did.
When the box arrived I picked up the 'Start Here' booklet and within an hour and three prints (13"x19") I was getting better results than the stuff I had paid a professional lab $15.00 each for! No more, I fair fired my lab.
I am printing from Photoshop CS3 using Adobe RGB color situation and ICC information. The prints are incredibly color saturated with huge disagreement to really 'pop'.
I am absolutely in fancy with this printer!
Another week:
No change in my conception, other than I like it even more. I printed 20 8x10 and 7 13x19 before having to add ink (Yellow and Cyan) . Prints on Epson's delicate art paper are fabulous! This is my last review.

